Shaminiras’s Weblog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

When Individualism meets Collectivism….. February 28, 2008

Filed under: 1 — shaminiras @ 9:07 am

This week we are learning  about intercultural communication. One of the main aspects of Intercultural communication is individualism and collectivism. Individualist cultures’s social behaviour is largely determined by their personal goals, attitudes and values whereas collectivist’s behaviour is largely determined by conformity , mutual sympathy and self-sacrifice for in-group members. Miss Hui mentioned that most of the Asian societies are collectivist cultures while the Western societies are individualist cultures.

In my opinion, I feel that Asian societies today are actually trying to incorporate many of collectivist aspects into their culture. One way is done through the various media. Especially in the Indian culture, it can be seen in various bollywood films, that they are trying to become more “liberal” just like the Westerners. You will know what I mean in jus a minute.

Please take a look at this video below.

This video is actually a tamil song from a recent movie. Yes I know, whatever happened to all those old-fashioned music videos where the girl runs behind the tree and plays hide-and-seek with the hero? (that is what used to happen in tamil movies in the olden days) It is evident that all the societies that were collectivist are slowly trying to adapt to the growing individualist culture that is spreading like wildfire. It is obvious from where the song also takes place; in a club with half-clad girls and a well-known rapper. The media has also taken more than enough initiatives to ensure that they do not lose the younger generations to the Western media which is more “liberal” in that sense. Therefore, like what the proverb goes ” If you can’t beat them, join them!”. That is exactly what collectivist societies are trying to do right now. It is a economic strategy to stay competitive with the western media; songs being more harder to understand, girls becoming thinner and guys wearing more bling. Asian societies know that they cannot obviously compete with the liberal Western culture , hence they have tried to incorprate many of Western elements into their many forms of media. It should be noted that the bollywood industry has already achieved this and almost on par with the Western industry. The tamil industry , on the other hand, is just slowly climbing up the social ladder. The song in the music video shown above is actually an old song that appeared in the 80’s. Producers have remixed this song and made it more appealing to the younger generation by “westernising” it and as a result this song has stayed on the top.

Being from a fairly conservative family,  you can imagine the shock when my family saw this video. The first thing that my mother turned around and asked me was ” What is happening to the indian kids nowadays!!”Well, I agree to disagree with her if you catch my pun. The younger generations are not exactly at fault as they have been born into a generation where we are celebrating freedom of speech, liberal worldviews and where bar -dancing is alright.; therefore, it is incorrect to blame the younger generations as the media mainstreams the world as such. On the other hand, it is not the parent’s fault as they did not have the many privileges that teenagers have. Hence, parents might be shocked as they might want their children to be exactly the way they had been when they were teenagers. Again, this might lead to conflicts between the parents and their children.

Even though, the media has become more liberal, it does not mean that families are also going to be the same. There is a positive and negative influence on various families. For example, an extremely ortodox family might look at the above video and deem it to be entirely unappopriate and ban their children from watching such shows ever again. This will result in extreme negative issues for the kid. He or she might be ostracised by other kids and even deemed a social misfit. The media has such power to inflict pain on those who do not go together with the flow of messages. On the contrary, if a family was open-minded, they would be willing to accept the fact that their culture is changing and accept the new ideas and concepts that are expressed through various forms of media. The older generations; however, might still have a conflict of interest between the younger generations.

I strongly feel that even though the media is inclined towards the Western culture more, an individual should not lose the essence of his or her culture because it is culture that has shaped our world today and makes us unique. I feel that adapting our culture to the changing trends in society is quite alright; however, an individual should not totally change from one culture to another. There is then no respect for the older generations as they have put in so much effort in ensuring that aspects of their culture are not compromised by the changing trends in society. This is the very basis of why we have various festivals celebrated by the different cultures in Singapore. It serves as a reminder to us that we still are part of something unique that nobody else haves.

Now, take a look at this video.

This is another music video by Timbaland entitled Indian Flute. See the irony? Western cultures are now adapting more and more of Indian elements into whatever they are showcasing. Other examples include Shakira’s “Hip’s Don’t Lie” . However, even though we see Westerners incorporating more of Indian elements into their media, they do not necessarily change from one culture to another. They just see it as a form of entertainment. Moreover, I believe that Westerners also see it as a form of attracting the new generations as there is a fusion of music expressed which is depicted as the East meeting the West. Westerners have the ability to retain their culture and accept new ideas as well. This is the case as they have been encouraged from a small age to accept new ideas and to speak their thoughs freely. Liberalisation has been a key element of their lives from the very beginning. Easterners on the other hand have just begun to experience the true flavours of liberalisation through the changes in society and the ever-changing trends that they must adopt to.

The bottomline is that both Western and Asian cultures are changing; however, the problem lies in not losing the essence of both the cultures. If by accident we do lose it, there is no hope of the younger generation ever learning about our culture just like what we did from our forefathers.

:)

 

Interpersonal Communication February 21, 2008

Filed under: 1 — shaminiras @ 4:16 am

This week we learnt mainly about interpersonal communication which is basically communication between individuals. Like Miss Hui said during lecture today, this is based solely on personal experiences and one cannot possibly evaluate the usage of interpersonal communication in films or movies.

I would like to concentrate on one main process of relationships between individuals; relational formation and developement.

Relational formation and development

1.) Physical Apperance:

Personally I feel that for friends this is not a very important factor as what I normally look for in friends are similar ideas that we might share instead of whether that particular person is attractive or not. However when it comes to choosing a significant other, for me, physical appearance does play quite a huge role. I mean my special companion must at least be presentable-looking with a sense of style and fashion. This is mainly because he is someone I am going to introduce to my family members. As a result, the opinions of my family members will be very much be dependent on the first impressions that he creates, hence physical appearance does play an important role for me.

2.) Similarity:

This is a very big aspect for me. Regardless of friends or my significant other, there must be a common frequency between me and that particular person. Like what my mother would say, ” a relationship won’t work out unless both of you swim in the same direction”. However, again similarity like physical appearance is a perception. Even though ideas between two people might be very similar, they are subjective as in the way the ideas are similar might be very different. For example, even though my friend and I share the same aspect of needing to take a vacation, we might have different ideas on where and how we want to have a vacation. Therefore, I feel that this should not be given much importance as people in relationships will learn to adapt to their friends or significant others by trying to flow in the same frequency as them.

3) Dissimilarity- Personally I feel that this theory is not applicable. It states that people tend to form relationships with others who are not similar or not part of a conformity. However, I believe that this relationship will only last for a short while. When both parties realise that there is nothing similar between both of them, they might just lose out and end the relationship. I am a person who looks for a long-term relationship, be it friends or anyone, therefore I do not look for people who are dissimilar to me.

4.) Exchange- This is another theory that I disagree with. It states that people are merely in a relationship that is considered as a transaction based on costs and benefits. On the contrary, I feel that people might just do something because they might like doing it out of the goodness of their heart. For example, if a boy surprises his girlfriend on valentines’ day by coming to her house, giving her a present and leaving immediately after, does this mean that he still expects something out of her or the relationship they are in? Defining a relationship based on costs and rewards is very degrading of the relationship itself and I feel that two individuals can be in a relationship without expecting anything from either one.

These are the 4 aspects of relational formation and development that I have certain opinions of. I believe these 4 are the most important aspects that an individual looks for before engaging in a conversation with another individual to create a relationship.

Those of you who disagree, please feel free to drop me some comments.. :)

 

The Simpsons and Verbal Communication February 13, 2008

Filed under: 1 — shaminiras @ 2:46 pm

Most of the public would have most probably watched The Simpsons.

Have you guys thought about the voice -overs for the characters? I have, on numerous occasions, given much thought to who could be the voice- overs for the unique personalities of the unique characters.

Firstly, I thought Bart Simpson (son of Homer Simpson) would be voiced over by a young male. Furthermore, I thought each character would have one voice over each. Therefore, it came as a very big shock to me when I discovered that Bart Simpson was voiced over by a female!!!!! Furthermore, almost each voice over took the parts of at least 10 characters on the average. Can you guys believe it? Maybe you all knew about this earlier, but since technology and I have been out of touch for very long, I just skimmed through you-tube videos and came across this astonishing news today.

Although, this may take a while to load please take your time to watch it. It is worth every single minute of your time.

I believe that verbal communication plays a very important role in this multi-award winning series. This video is actually the last of a five-part  interview in ”In the Actors Studio”. It provided me with useful insight into the usage of verbal communication.

Firstly, language is often a powerful relational tool. Therefore, when Homer Simpson says really mushy stuff to his wife when he is drunk (which is like always !), one cannot help but also feel some form of affection towards him. The words that he uses are not at all understandable, however he has formed his own “language” with the words that he uses and hence we tend to feel affection towards him. 

It is to be noted that just like what I stated above, the words that each of the individual characters used in The Simpsons in turn relate to their character. Through their verbl communication with each other and the manner they interact with other family members, we get an idea of what their character is and we in turn develop our own views about them. Therefore, it is obvious that verbal communication helps to decide how a person views another person as well. For instance, Lisa (Homer Simpson’s daughter) is always the ” good” girl who always cares about others and ever-ready to lend a helping hand. You might ask how I know this? (well, I have asked myself many times this!) The truth is, I do not know. I do not Lisa personally and yet I have managed to form an impression of her in my mind just by looking at the way she speaks. Lisa never uses any vulgarities and there is a stark contrast between Bart and Lisa in the manner that they speak. In my opinion, I feel that this is generally a good tactic used by the director (who is the voice over for Homer Simpson and 10 other roles) to convey the different personalities that are portrayed in the family.    

Towards the end, one of the first-year students asked about whether their roles as actors affected their outlook on life.

It seems that there is a cult in England that idolises Ned Flanders! The power of the language and the way he has related to people of similar characteristics can be evidently shown here. For those who never have watched The Simpsons before, Ned Flanders is a very pious person who always follows in the way of Christianity. There are certain jargons that he uses that are associated with Christanity and this in turn has attracted millions of fans just because of the fact that they are just as pious as he is. For example, any incident that happens or any action that anyone uses, Ned Flanders always associates it with Jesus Christ. Instead of seeing whether he is religiously correct, it can be noted that the ability of Ned to influence others through his words s indeed extremely large. It seems that the cult only watches The Simpsons when the episodes that are being screened include Ned Flanders. All the other times, they watch reruns of the same episode repeatedly. Moreoever, instead of visiting churches, it seems that this particular cult listens to a particular sermon given by Ned Flanders on one of the episode. You can see the power of verbal communication very well in this instance.

However, it is obvious that there are downsides to the show as well. Like what is mentioned in the video above, it was criticised as it allowed Bart to use words like “Kiss my ass” and a few others. On top of that, it uses slang that tend to exclude other minority groups and “encourages” racism. For example Papu, an Indian who owes the local grocery store, is voiced over with a strong Indian accent after living in the same neighbourhood as The Simpsons for 20 years. Therefore in a way, I feel that they should try to minimise the usage of slangs and jargon and maximise the usage of more appropriate words. Culture is the main element that is being affected here. What is the show trying to encourage? It is very difficult to answer that question. Although through Lisa they might try to instill some good values among the kids, in some shows even good-two-shoes Lisa was depicted as being a bad girl. When the director does it, it throws the younger generation into confusion over what to believe.  

Personally, I feel that it was alright as the show was targeted at a much older generation. Of course, it is definitely not suited for kids because of the ambiguous language used and bypassing may occur. Kids may be subjected to various intepretations and this of course will pose a problem for their parents. Therefore, the bottomline is that this is just not the programme for the younger generatio as they lack the thinking to critically analyse what the show is actually trying to tell and may end up having the wrong idea.

Simpson fanatics have actually written a Simpson’s dictionary. This is unbelievable right? Although the show has been running successfully for 13 years, I feel that more improvements could be made for the programme. For example, maybe the use of jargons could be terminated and more grammatically correct english could be used. This is case will in turn will make the show lose its “unique” factor which makes it so appealing. Therefore, there must be some kind of balance where the slangs and jargons are equal to grammatically correct english. Maybe, the director can work towards achieving this purpose.

 However all in all, I still love The Simpsons!!

Like Homer J Simpson would say “D’OH!!!!” (in the Simpson’s script, this is referred to as an “annoyed grunt” :)

P.S. Those who want to catch it, they air it on star world everyday at 6 pm and sundays on channel 5 at 7. 

P.S.S Those who want to watch the full interview, just go to you tube and type “The Simpsons-Inside the Actor’s Studio”